What is the Meme-ing of All This?

Salt Bae MemeThey’re everywhere. If you’ve ever been on the internet, so much as connected to Wi-Fi, or even had contact with a millennial or Gen Zer, you have definitely come across a meme. Even the more technologically uninclined generation of grandparents have some experience with memes, whether it be from witnessing their grandchildren perfectly re-enact a vine, or from overhearing them “spilling the tea”, or from wondering at their distaste for Comic Sans MC, or from seeing them dramatically sprinkling invisible salt, meme culture is so pervasive and encompassing that not even the relative shelter of old age can shield one from it.

The word meme has been around since Richard Dawkins coined it in his book, The Selfish Gene, in 1976 and defined the term as a unit of cultural information spread through non-genetic means, especially imitation. He, however, was studying genetics and was trying to understand, from an evolutionary perspective, why some seemingly nonsensical behaviours remain prevalent in human society. He concluded that, due to ruthless and unforgiving natural selection, any common behaviour that is present in a thriving population would be propagated in terms of gene survival, even if such behaviour appeared inexplicable. Dawkins then expanded his theory to attempt to explain why some ideas, seemingly injurious to the beholders, are perpetuated in society and concluded that the idea itself is undergoing its own kind of natural selection. Thus, he coined the term ‘meme’ from the ancient Greek ‘mimime’, which translates to ‘imitated thing’. Although never intending for his term to be applied – or more essentially hijacked – for the emerging internet phenomenon, it is easy to see how Dawkins’ term has been appropriated for what are commonly known as memes today.

These bite-sized pieces of information and entertainment appear to serve no logical purpose in society past creativity, being shared, being liked, and making people laugh, and are rapidly propagated through imitation. According to this definition, memes as we conceive of them today have been around since the first smiley emoticon 🙂 was created in 1982 by American computer scientist, Scott E. Fahlman. This prompted endless variations and improvements and thus meme culture had begun. The first mainstream example of viral digital content surfaced when a video of rows of dancing hamsters GIFs was posted on Canadian art student Deidre Lacarte’s website in 1998, prompting spin-offs in the forms of songs and remixes in one of the first instances of copycat memes. Nowadays, anyone can create viral internet content with the use of websites like Meme Generator and programs like PhotoShop to create their own meme or meme trend that can reach millions around the world.

Demographic Cohort
The demographic cohorts

And though memes have been around for many years, it remains a phenomenon that is heavily associated with millennials and Generation Z. As the most digitally literate generation of any age in history, it seems only natural that this would be the era of internet culture, but why are memes so popular when they are seemingly so mindless? Surely we have risen above the need for natural selection to propagate ideas and behaviour within our global internet culture in order to determine the surviving traits of the thriving populace? Is there more to meme culture than that of Dawkins’ still highly contested theory? To find out the answers to these questions, I interviewed a selection of UCT students as well as Dr. Ron Irwin, a media lecturer at the university.

Dr. Irwin said that the emergence of meme culture and popularity is typical and expected of a “sharing generation” of “media denizens that are using numerous kinds of media” who are “used to being as provocative and as out there as possible”. Add this to an internet society in which they are “rewarded” for creating imaginative and popular content, and it is clear to see why he expresses the belief that “this generation shares things just because it’s funny or just for inclusion without thinking about whether it’s offensive or whether it could come back to bite them down the line.” With the near-overwhelming inundation of memes in all forms of online content it would seem, as Professor Irwin explains, that “a lot of the social media platforms out there are being polluted by people who are creating snarky, easy-to-digest, negative messages and memes”.And though memes have been around for many years, it remains a phenomenon that is heavily associated with millennials and Generation Z. As the most digitally literate generation of any age in history, it seems only natural that this would be the era of internet culture, but why are memes so popular when they are seemingly so mindless? Surely we have risen above the need for natural selection to propagate ideas and behaviour within our global internet culture in order to determine the surviving traits of the thriving populace? Is there more to meme culture than that of Dawkins’ still highly contested theory? To find out the answers to these questions, I interviewed a selection of UCT students as well as Dr. Ron Irwin, a media lecturer at the university.

Dr. Irwin said that the emergence of meme culture and popularity is typical and expected of a “sharing generation” of “media denizens that are using numerous kinds of media” who are “used to being as provocative and as out there as possible”. Add this to an internet society in which they are “rewarded” for creating imaginative and popular content, and it is clear to see why he expresses the belief that “this generation shares things just because it’s funny or just for inclusion without thinking about whether it’s offensive or whether it could come back to bite them down the line.” With the near-overwhelming inundation of memes in all forms of online content it would seem, as Professor Irwin explains, that “a lot of the social media platforms out there are being polluted by people who are creating snarky, easy-to-digest, negative messages and memes”.

However, the current generation expressed an opposing viewpoint, best summarised by Michael van der Berg (19), a humanities student, who pointed to the technological revolution as the origin of teenagers creating memes “where relatability between people across multimedia and social media platforms” fostered expression and connection through critiquing, debating, and engaging with memes whilst also being able to laugh about them. “So, it’s realism and comedy in one with relatability” he says, which almost totally encompasses the feelings of this generation towards memes, save for their emphasis on creativity and an interesting reference to a feeling of pride and collective identity in the act of creating memes themselves.

Auliya Badrudeen (23), humanities student and self-professed Queen of Memes, said that memes are “all about relationships and relatability” and “about bridging gaps and making connections” with other people. This sentiment is best echoed in the words of Matthew Rensburg (20), another humanities student, who said that “memes have become so popular because it’s a way of raising an issue, but in such a way that people can relate to it” and also laugh about it, allowing a collective “release [knowing] that everyone is going through a similar thing and that you’re not alone”. Most students expressed that the relatability of memes helped them to feel less isolated in an age of increasing interconnectedness that puts them squarely behind a screen and somewhat hinders communication.

Shakespeare Meme

Media Student Lauren Norstrom (21), says that to some extent she feels like memes worsen the communication between our generation. “Where’s the real content?” she asks, “We’re just sharing these silly photos when there are actual issues going on around the world.” However, she admits that memes have “created a platform to be more sociable and people have really connected through these things” and even made careers out of memes. This dual-view is held by most of the students I interviewed, who admitted to memes enhancing and hindering communication amongst their generation. “I just feel that the digital world is taking away that basic human interaction which we need,” says Matthew. But on the other hand, he concedes that memes have “done a lot for our generation because it’s become a way for us to speak about what we need to mention, but in a way that’s not direct” but is also impactful and memorable enough to convey your point to those who the message is targeted at.

When it comes to conveying a message, the students stressed the importance of memes as a form of expression. Construction Studies student Darmarajan Chinasamy described memes as “the best way to say what you think and what you can’t show” because you can represent and share what you like. Michael reinforced this view by saying that memes allow you to “see how other people experience things” and how they express themselves through what they post online. In a world where the news is flooded with events of violence, corruption, greed, and harsh realities, memes allow young people to find a lighthearted escape and platform for individuality and expression.

And memes do not only allow for expression of individuality and creativity, according to the interviewed students, memes are a way to connect with people and form a sense of solidarity. Cindy Makau, a media student, singled out the ability of memes to connect different people from all around the globe as truly “empowering” in its inclusion of anyone and everyone in meme culture. Lauren supports this view, saying that it’s “kind of nice to know that you aren’t alone” and that there is comfort and kinship in having a “similar sense of humour to thousands of people.” This is reassuring to many, as Matt explains: “everything is so serious” with a generation that is flooded with work and pressures – be it from education or their family – and this participation in an online community creates a sense of fellowship through shared experience and meme culture.

Social work student Tyler Rhodes (19), highlights this experience of connection as a way in which memes “bring light to our dark world of everyone being so serious, of everyone hating on each other”, saying that memes are “just another way of finding joy, of people expressing themselves”. In a time of increasing globalisation that places great value on creative content, it is only logical that millennials and Gen Zers would turn to memes as a source of humour, expression and connection that allows them to overcome their feelings of isolation.

“I think that every generation has their way of escaping reality.” says Auliya. Despite the best attempts of the older generations, memes and meme culture are “not something to be ashamed of” because you “can’t be rooted in reality for every single second” as the current state of the world is maddening to most. Everyone needs their ways to “just sit back and relax”, and this is exactly the release that memes provide.

To a generation that was brought up on revolutionary technology, placed under immense pressure to achieve, be creative, and make their mark on the world, memes come as a welcome outlet. They allow for expression, a chance for connection, a platform to be social and relate to other people in a way that has been hampered by the distancing effect of technological communication. The relatability and humour of memes is what appeals to this generation, who are aware of the negative effects and divisions that a society driven by technology can bring. It is precisely this knowledge that makes the connection and communal laughter of memes all the more meaningful to them.

Interviewees
How the interviewees described their interpretation of and relationship with memes

For more on meme culture, click here

DA vs. de Lille

After being removed as mayor of Cape Town on Tuesday and having her DA membership retracted, Patricia de Lille has taken to the courts to fight the motions and allegations against her. In seeking to retain her party membership and mayoral position, de Lille intends to challenge the constitutional validity of the clause used to remove her from power and prevent the DA from filling her position as she fights to regain her seat at the head of Cape Town.

Patricia de Lille
Ousted Mayor Patricia de Lille

De Lille claims that she has the support of Premier Helen Zille who is “appalled” at how de Lille has been treated, as the DA cannot simultaneously lodge a motion of no confidence against her and have disciplinary processes. Luckily for de Lille, the Cape High Court ruled on Friday that the Electoral Commission of South Africa cannot fill de Lille’s vacancy until the proceedings have run their due course. However, the Cape High Court has reserved judgement on de Lille’s application for an interim order to get her job back.

De Lille’s advocate, Dali Mpofu, maintains that she is still a fully-fledged DA member, councilor, and mayor as the cessation of her membership and position was unlawful – a position which is contested by council for the DA, Sean Rosenberg, who states that they followed the proper processes when terminating her membership. According to IOL, Mpofu claims that de Lille was ousted from the party following an “unlawful process” as the part of the constitution used to remove de Lille had been annulled.

TimesLive reported that chairman of the DA’s federal executive, James Selfe, stated that the DA had revoked the clause that stated: “A member ceases to be a member when he or she…publicly declares his or her intention to resign…from the party.” De Lille was ousted following a radio interview on April 26 with Eusebius McKaiser, talk show host for Radio 702, in which she allegedly announced her intentions to resign from the DA after she cleared her name of several allegations of wrongdoing were lodged against her. According to Selfe, this announcement is what cost de Lille her membership.

On Friday, de Lille brought an application to restore her membership and mayoral position before the court, pending an application to have the termination of her membership reviewed and dismissed. This review application is scheduled to be held on May 25. DA counsel, Sean Rosenberg, told the court that the application “must fail” as De Lille is not seeking “the preservation of the status quo” in reclaiming her position, but rather seeks a “radical remedy” to reverse her situation, and thus restoring her to power would be “risky”.

Until the de Lille’s review application comes to fruition, her counsel maintains that she is at great personal risk and “vulnerable” as the party has removed her bodyguards and there are those who are “against” de Lille and her rule. In this uncertain interim, Selfe “sincerely apologises” on behalf of the DA, saying that they “recognise that we will need to build trust with the voters” again during this “confusing time”.

Korean Reunification?

Handshake
Photo courtesy of News24: President Kim Jong-Un and President Moon Jae-In shake hands over the Military Demarcation Line that divides their countries

After 65 years of separation and tension, President Kim Jong-Un of North Korea and President Moon Jae-In of South Korea held a historic peace summit in late April, only the third of its kind since the war between the Koreas ended. With progressing promises of reunification and peace between the two nations, it seems that this may be one for the history books, as optimism for a united Korea and a denuclearisation programme continues to grow.

The relationship between these countries has been defined by the divisive actions taken during the Korean War that began in 1950. When 75 000 North Korean soldiers crossed the boundary between the Soviet-supporting north and the pro-Western south, this marked the first military invasion of the Cold War. By July 1953, some 5 million Koreans had died, and the war finally came to an end, but the peninsula has remained divided to this day. Since the armistice at the end of the war, no North Korean leader has entered the South until the current presidents shook hands over the Military Demarcation Line that divides the two countries and President Jong-Un stepped into the South to commence the summit.

And this appears to truly mark a change in the relationship between the two countries, as News24 reports that President Jong-Un has stated that he is “determined to send a starting signal at the threshold of a new history.” President Moon said that he wishes the talks to reach a “bold agreement” so that they can give a “big gift” to the people of both Koreas who want peace.

However, whilst tensions between the Koreas are at a promising all-time low, tensions between North Korea and the US remain at a high. Last year Pyongyang conducted their sixth and most powerful nuclear blast to date and fired missiles capable of reaching targets on the US mainland, prompting further strain on relations between President Trump and President Jong-Un (or as the leader of the free world called him in a Twitter response to these nuclear tests, “rocket man”).

In the wake of the imposing nuclear threat of North Korea, it would seem that America has just as much to gain by peace being successfully brokered between the Koreas. According to News24, the White House released a statement saying that they hope the summit will “achieve progress toward a future of peace and prosperity” and President Trump continues to demand that the North relinquish their weapons. Washington is also pushing for complete, guaranteed, and irreversible denuclearization of North Korea and it appears that these talks might just be able to achieve that.

As the North’s nuclear capabilities and weaponry remains an important factor in the peace talks between the nations, President Jae-In continues to reach for a peaceful solution. North Korea’s official KCNA news agency confirmed that President Jong-Un will “open-heartedly discuss” these and all other issues that pertain to “achieving peace, prosperity and reunification of the Korean peninsula.”

Guilty Verdict: Bill Cosby Faces Justice, But for How Long?

Bill Cosby at the Retrial
Bill Cosby faces justice

Bill Cosby was found guilty of three accounts of aggravated indecent assault this past Thursday in a Norristown, Pennysylvania court for drugging and sexually assaulting Andrea Constand in his Philadelphia home in 2004. Although Cosby faces up to 10 years imprisonment on each count, he is likely to serve them concurrently and a sentencing hearing with Judge Steven O’Neill is yet to be scheduled. Cosby remains out on bail, and legal experts say that he may well never be incarcerated as his legal team works the legal system for every possible delay they can.

Andrea Constand, a former employee with Temple University women’s basketball team, testified that Cosby drugged and sexually assaulted her when she visited his home to ask for career advice as he was a powerful trustee at Temple. The current case against Cosby focused on her testimony as well as the testimonies of five other women who have accused Cosby of sexually assaulting them decades ago, showing that Cosby’s assault of Constand formed part of a long pattern.

However, Cosby’s defense team is likely to appeal this guilty verdict on the grounds that allowing these five women to testify unfairly prejudiced the jury. Cosby representative Ebonee Benson told Good Morning America that this caused “a huge amount of prejudice and bias” against Cosby unfairly as these women were allowed to “testify to crimes which he was not on trial for”.

According to CNN legal analyst Joey Jackson, this appeal could take anywhere between months to years, saying that “I think he’ll ask the court and do whatever he needs to, to have his client remain out at liberty” for as long as possible until the appeal is resolved. Cosby remains free on $1 million bail in his Pennsylvania home, and will be fitted with a GPS tracking device should he wish to relocate to one of his other homes in another state. Due to this freedom, the lengthiness of his legal team’s appeal, his age (80) and health there is reason to question whether Cosby will ever serve his sentence behind bars.

According to legal analyst Areva Martin, if Cosby is imprisoned at the end of this appeal, it is highly likely that Cosby will serve a reduced sentence based on the judge’s rulings so far. She told CNN that the judge will have to take many factors into account such as his age, health, the fact that this is his first criminal conviction, and the “the philanthropic work that he’s done over the last several decades”. So although Cosby faces a maximum of 30 years in prison, he is likely to serve far less time than this, should he outlive the time his defense team’s appeal will buy him.

However, it seems that for many, this guilty verdict is enough. As the first celebrity sexual assault trial since the #MeToo movement began, this case has become representative of impending change that is finally reaching the courtrooms. CNN reported that Attorney Gloria Allred, who represents many of the Cosby accusers, said that “We are so happy that finally we can say, women are believed.”

Lights, Camera, Applause: The Journey to Shotties 2018

“Fuck it, let’s do this.”

Crews huddle together in proud anticipation. Cameras flash. The red carpet guides the young filmmakers to the silver screen and their debuts. The cinema fills with family and friends. Lights dim. An eager silence grips the crowd and hands reach out to clasp each other as the first title fades onto the screen. And it was those five words that brought the cast and crew of Encounters here.

Cast and Crew
The cast and crew of Encounters celebrate their victory at Shottie

UCT Film Society’s annual short film competition, Shotties, took place last Thursday with a sold-out Labia and a popularity so overwhelming that standing-room tickets had to be sold. This night marked the big-screen debut, weeks of hard work in the making, of 10 student short films. The theme? Empathy and moral ambiguity. With films ranging from Russian Roulette to transgender issues, to murder, love, forgetting and connecting, this was truly a night that left the audience with eyes full stars. And arms full of awards for a few lucky film crews. Encounters was just one such team, receiving four Shotties awards for Best Screenplay, Best Director, Best Editor (making it Liam Fieggan’s second year of winning this award, last year for his work on Bokeh), and Best Picture and coming runner-up for Best Actor they received half of the total titles that Shotties awards.

Magnus and Floki
Writer-director Magnus Taljaard and cat Floki

Following this unrivalled success, I sat down with the writer-director of Encounters, Magnus Taljaard (20), to discuss his journey to the Labia’s silver screen this year. The scripts had been selected a month earlier, and from there the writers and directors chose the cast and crew that would soon bring their vision into reality. But as anyone who has worked on a film set knows, this is a task filled with problems you never even knew could go wrong that will test your dedication, resolve and extremely creative problem-solving skills to the absolute limit. However, this is truly a worthwhile and rewarding experience according to Encounters director Magnus Taljaard: “I think that it all-in-all was just a glorious experience to get some more practical knowledge about filmmaking than I possibly could have learnt in a lecture.”

The trials and triumphs of student films ultimately boil down to, “A learning experience – a glorious one at that.” Magnus reclines in his leather armchair with his teenage kitten, Floki, purring contentedly in his lap, and recounts a moment on set when his cinematographer, “who in a way had been a little bit of a rock of [his]” had realised that they had been shooting on the wrong ISO (the camera’s sensitivity to light) that resulted in a grainy image. “I realised that we’re all just students, we’re all students who are either trying to get into the film industry or are trying to beef up our CV” says Magnus, “it also brought forth the realisation that we live and we learn, that we’re here to gain experience, we’re here to better our discipline, to better ourselves in a way” and that filming was “an absolutely riveting experience” despite the inevitable setbacks.

Encounters
Encounters is screened at the Labia

Magnus stressed the importance of having a cohesive, supportive and trustworthy crew, saying that he “managed to be blessed enough to have an absolutely phenomenal crew and cast” whose praises he could not stop singing. From the cinematographer with “a willpower that I envy and appreciate more than words can express”, to the co-director who was affectionately known as ‘Functional Human’ on set who successfully managed to keep everyone working effectively and productively, to the editor who he made run back and forth during the all-important editing process, Magnus tributes his team with “provid[ing] me with the hope of actually creating a successful film”. After all of the filming and editing “my cast and crew ended up consisting of friends” and this is what made it all possible for Magnus. That’s what made all the difference in creating something that was worthy of pride and awards: “We had a very good rapport on set, even in between the chaos and drama we found a way to laugh,” be it through impromptu music videos, monologues about hummus, or pre-shooting yoga warmup sessions.

“I owe the members of the crew more than I can actually give them.”

From a simple script-submission, entitled “Fuck it, let’s do this”, Magnus now has a successful and award-winning film, much to his disbelief. “It still feels unreal” he says. After absurdly memorable days of filming, after a near-unbelievable editing process, after an unforgettable night that left Magnus with more certificates, trophies and award-bags than he could carry by himself, he had this to say to any aspiring filmmakers: “As long as you have a good intention, as long as you can stick by that intention, you can use that as fuel for your fire…fuck it, do it. Because that will carry you through one way or another.”

Chemical Weapons Attack in Syria (Trump Responds on Twitter)

On the 7 April, the previously rebel-occupied town of Douma in Syria fell under siege from a suspected chemical weapons attack. White House spokeswoman, Sarah Sanders, informed reporters that the US holds Russia and Syria personally responsible for the attacks that left dozens dead and still more injured, although no final military decisions have been made as yet. Both the Syrian and Russian governments deny any involvement in the attacks, however, senior US military sources and The New York Times report that Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s forces are moving aircraft, equipment and personnel to a Russian base near Latakia in order to protect themselves from any potential military attacks, as it is rumoured that the US, UK, and France are preparing a military strike in response to the chemical attack.

The town of Douma stood as the last rebel base of operation near the capital Damascus until, as opposition activists and rescuers report, government aircraft dropped chemical bombs on it last Sunday. The BBC reported that when local aid workers and the Syrian-American Medical Society – a partner of the UN’s World Health Organisation that operates in rebel-held areas – arrived on the scene, they found over 500 people suffering from symptoms “indicative of exposure to a chemical agent” and 70 people dead – 43 of whom displayed symptoms of exposure to highly toxic chemicals. In a fearful response to these attacks, the airways above Syria have been abandoned according to commercial flight-tracking website FlightRadar24, despite UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres advising against letting the situation “spiraling out of control”.

The UN security council met on Tuesday in an attempt to do just this which unfortunately failed as both Russia and the US reached an uncompromising stalemate in their stance regarding international response to the use of chemical weapons. According to the Mail & Guardian, French President Emmanuel Macron told reporters that if airstrikes were to be authorised, they would target Syrian government chemical facilities. However, Russia claims that no trace of chemical weapons were found at the site, and that the US and its allies are using this issue as a “pretext” for military intervention in Syria.

In true compliance with his track record, President Trump took to his favourite platform for informing the US (Twitter) on Wednesday in order to denounce the attacks in Syria and any Russian involvement. Trump condemned the Syrian President as a “Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!” and warned the Kremlin against continuing to ally themselves with Syria. These tweets appear to be in response to the Russian ambassador to Lebanon, Alexander Zasypkin, stating that any missile fired at Russia would be shot down. Trump’s following tweets lamented the current state of relations between the US and Russia, especially considering that both countries are capable of nuclear war, and singled out the “Fake and Corrupt Russia Investigation driven by the all Democrat loyalists, or people that worked for Obama” as the cause of the “bad blood” between Russia and the US.”

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Russia has responded by blaming the suspected chemical weapons attack on Syrian opposition forces, and have denied any involvement in it. The New York Times reported that Putin’s spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, also responded to Trump’s series of tweets by saying that they “don’t participate in Twitter diplomacy” but rather “advocate serious approaches.” Russia continues to stand by its assertion that the attack was faked or staged as a “pretext” to justify western interference in Syria.

Faith in the Fallen: Zuma Supporters Rally at KwaZulu-Natal High Court

Zuma Supporters
Zuma supporters marching with “#handsoffzuma” posters

For the first time since 2009, former-president Jacob Zuma appeared in the KwaZulu-Natal High Court in Durban this Friday, 6 April, where he is facing 16 charges, including fraud, racketeering and money-laundering. A large crowd of ANC loyalists and Zuma supporters – including religious leaders and political figures – gathered at the high court, cheering for Zuma and sporting posters reading “#handsoffzuma”.

The proceedings began early in the morning, but lasted just ten minutes as the case was postponed to June 8, with News24 reporting that Zuma’s legal representative said that they intend to file an application to re-evaluate NPA boss, Shaun Abrahams’ decision to prosecute Zuma on May 15. This will be the third time that Zuma and his legal team have requested the NPA to review the case and charges against him, which many believe to be mere delay-tactics.

After the court case was postponed, Zuma spoke to the crowd in isiZulu, claiming his innocence and saying that “there are some people, even people whom I trusted, who have judged me as guilty already” and that

“the truth will be revealed in time.”

Zuma also claims that the case has been reinstated for political reasons, and that his persecution was being pursued in courts due to opposition parties’ failure in Parliament.

Zuma’s crowd of supporters had gathered in King Dinizulu Park since 08h00 that morning, many dressed in ANC colours, waving party flags and posters, and cheering “We love you”. This was followed by a march to the court, organised by the National Interfaith Council of South Africa, where some participants had traveled from as far as the Northern Cape to show their allegiance to the former-president.

Zuma also had the support of senior ANC KwaZulu-Natal leaders and former cabinet ministers as he entered the courtroom, such as former minister of cooperative and traditional affairs, Des van Rooyen, and Eastern Cape ANC member Andile Lungisa. Further high-ranking loyalties were extended to Zuma, as he was flanked by a guard of honour by religious leaders upon his departure from the high court.

Sandpaper Scandal: Australian Cricketers Banned for Ball-tampering

Bancroft Ball-Tampering
Cameron Bancroft tampering with the ball

After a promising stretch of cricket, the Australia cricket team arrived in South Africa to begin the Test series, in what promised to be a series of worthy and exciting matches. However, during the third Test on the 25 March, Cameron Bancroft, 25, fielder and opening batsman for Australia, was caught tampering with the ball, sending the reputation of the Australian side spiraling into disrepute.

Bancroft was caught on camera trying to tamper with the ball using sandpaper, which he originally claimed was tape. What followed was what many consider to be an overreaction to the offense, with Australian leg-spinner Shane Warne telling Sydney’s Daily Telegraph that “the jump to hysteria is something that has elevated the offence beyond what they actually did,” and that “we’re at a point where the punishment just might not fit the crime.” Both the captain Steve Smith and vice-captain David Warner received year-long bans from professional cricket, and Bancroft received nine months. Coach Darren Lehmann also announced that he will be stepping down after the final Test against South Africa in Johannesburg.

In a news conference in Sydney, Smith issued an emotional apology for the ball-tampering scandal, claiming “a failure of [his] leadership” allowed the ball-tampering to happen and that he is deeply sorry for the event and for “the pain I have brought to Australia and the fans and the public.” This speech, in which he broke down into tears, gained him a wave of sympathy from the Australian public, but prompted an article from The Times titled, “Dear Australia, that’s enough now: this was ball-tampering not murder”.

Others involved have also expressed their shame in their actions, with Bancroft telling Australian media that

“It’s something I will regret for the rest of my life. I feel like I’ve let everyone down in Australia.”

Warner, who has been banned from assuming any leadership positions in the future as the investigation found that he instructed Bancroft how to carry out the ball-tampering, spoke vehemently against any form of ball-tampering in the past. After South African skipper Faf du Plessis was found guilty of ball-tampering by changing the condition of the ball with mints that he was sucking on, Warner publicly stated that he “would be very disappointed if one of our team members did that.” He also added that “the rules are in place for a reason, if you’re not going to use them then why bother having them”.

Fear of ‘Big Brother’: Why People Around the World are #deletingfacebook

According to stories released by the New York Times and the Observer this week, Cambridge Analytica, a marketing, targeting, data mining and analysis company, used information gathered from Facebook users to sway voter opinion in both the buildup to Brexit and Trump’s 2016 electoral campaign. In videos secretly recorded by UKs Channel 4 News, in which reporters posed as potential clients from Sri Lanka, the CEO of Cambridge Analytica, Alexander Nix, boasted of their psychographic profiling tools’ ability to target demographics and to tailor campaigns to users’ personality traits. This has caused Facebook’s shares to drop by nearly $50 billion, and they may be facing serious legal consequences from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), while users around the world are taking it upon themselves to delete the app from their phones as they feel that their privacy has been violated, spawning the hashtag #deletingfacebook.

According to The Guardian, Nix told the undercover reporters that they

“put information into the bloodstream of the internet and then watch it grow, give it a little push every now and again”

and that “this stuff infiltrates the online community, but with no branding, so it’s unattributable, untrackable.” The executive boasted that Cambridge Analytica, “did all the research, all the data, all the analytics, all the targeting” for Trump’s electoral campaign, claiming that it was vital to his success.  Mark Turnbull, managing director of Cambridge Analytica’s political division, took credit for the controversial ‘Defeat Crooked Hillary’ part of Trump’s campaign, and said that the company sometimes uses ‘proxy organisations’ to circulate the information in a way that cannot be traced back to them.

Christopher Wylie
Whistleblower Christopher Wylie (Image credit: Jake Naughton, The Washington Pos

Whistleblower Christopher Wylie told the Observer that data mined by Cambridge researcher Aleksandr Kogan, who then sold it to Cambridge Analytica, was used to influence the US presidential elections, saying that “[we] built models to exploit what we knew about them and target their inner demons.” Whilst increasing fears about user privacy is a valid question, Cambridge Analytica may not have had the influence on elections that they are being made out to have, as Ted Cruz used their services during the Republican Primary in 2016 and his former aide, Rick Tyler, told The New York Times that the psychographic models proved unreliable.

According to an article in Reuters, Facebook has stated that “The entire company is outraged we were deceived,” but continues to be under speculation from the FTC about whether they violated a 2011 consent decree regarding privacy practices. Facebook says that the data in question was unknowingly harvested by Kogan, who created an app on Facebook that collected the information of not only the 270 000 people who willingly downloaded it, but that of their friends as well. This amounts to 50 million Facebook users whose data and personal information was accessed by Kogan, who then sold it to Cambridge Analytica. However, in an interview with BBC’s Radio 4, Kogan claimed that he is being used as a scapegoat:

“Honestly we thought we were acting perfectly appropriately. We thought we were doing something that was really normal.”

Facebook says that this sale of information violated their policies, and has suspended their business relationship with both Cambridge Analytica and Kogan.

When Nix, who has since been suspended by Cambridge Analytica, spoke to the BBC on Monday, he said that he “has huge amounts of regret that we undertook this meeting and spoke with a certain amount of hyperbole.” Cambridge Analytica has said that his comments in the undercover video “do not represent the values or operations of the firm” in a statement on Tuesday.

Facebook’s losses due to this scandal have amounted to a drop of nearly $50 billion in its stock market value since the advent of Channel 4 News’ exposé, as investors, worried about the company’s reputation-damaging association with Cambridge Analytica, deter advertisers and promote restrictive regulation. And with the #deletingfacebook gaining traction on Twitter and sparking debates across social media, it seems that people’s fear of ‘Big Brother’ might be enough to make many users delete the app for good.

Facebook Stock
Facebook’s stock (16 March – 22 March)

However, Facebook has successfully made itself a seemingly indispensable part of our daily lives, providing us with a platform for everything from accessible entertainment, news, business profiles, an archive for our memories, a way to keep in touch with people (not to mention reminding us about their birthdays) and being notoriously hard to delete and deactivate your account. At the end of the day, the question remains: Will you be #deletingfacebook?

Snapchat’s Losing Streak

Snapchat has come under heavy criticism in recent weeks from both its general public and celebrity users. First they received backlash over the new update that many users complained about finding difficult to navigate, then their stocks plummeted after a tweet from Kylie Jenner, and finally there was an blunt and pointed Instagram response from Rihanna regarding a particularly offensive ad that was placed on Snapchat. The latter incident raising questions about the effective monitoring of third parties in self-service ad platforms.

Kylie Jenner’s Tweet regarding Snapchat (21 February 2018)

In late February, Kylie Jenner voiced her lost interest in Snapchat after the app had come under heavy fire for its most recent update, after which Snapchat’s market value plummeted by $1,3 billion. Daniel Ives, Chief Strategy Officer at GBH Insights, a marketing insights firm, told CNN that he believes that “Wall Street is hypersensitive to the app redesign” and “With roughly 25 million followers, [Jenner] carries a loud mouthpiece that speaks to today’s knee jerk reaction in shares.” This “overreaction” as Ives calls it, is said to be caused by many of Jenner’s followers removing the app from their phones as well as investors withdrawing their investments in Snapchat in anticipation of this.

The Snapchat ad for ‘Would You Rather’ and Rihanna’s Instagram response

Once Snapchat began regaining its market value, the app was once again subject to the ire of an unhappy celebrity last week. Rihanna was featured in an offensive ad on Snapchat, one which she felt would “intentionally bring shame to DV victims and made a joke of it.” The ad was for a mobile game called ‘Would You Rather?’ and presented users with the option to either “Slap Rihanna” or “Punch Chris Brown”, who pleaded guilty in 2009 to beating Rihanna during an argument. Rihanna responded to this ad on her Instagram story, telling them to “Throw the whole the app-oligy away” for “this mess” that she stated would negatively impact and shame those suffering from domestic violence. This ad and Rihanna’s response to it sent Snapchat’s stocks sliding by 4%, losing them nearly a billion dollars last week according to the Wall Street Journal.

Despite being created by a third party, the ad still had to go through Snapchat’s approval process, that the company says are “subject to our review policy” in order to prevent depictions of things such as excessive violence. Ives told CNN that “Social media platforms continue to have troubles with catching all offensive ads…Snap dropped the ball on this ad.” This showcases the potential dangers of self-service ad platforms, a method used by many social networks, which effectively lets companies purchase and submit ads without human interaction and calls to question the efficiency of the screening process for these ads. Snapchat has apologized for the ad, saying that it was “reviewed and approved in error, as it violates our advertising guidelines.”

Snapchat responded by taking down the ad, blocking ‘Would you Rather’ as an advertiser, and said in a statement to The Verge that “This advertisement is disgusting and never should have appeared on our service. We are so sorry we made the terrible mistake of allowing it through our review process” and that they are investigating how this happened.

Snapchat also mentioned that a member of their Safety Advisory Board is the Executive Vice President of the National Network to End Domestic Violence, and that they support this group. As for the change in the layout caused by the new update that so many users are calling for the end of (a petition on Change.org has already received over 1.2 million signatures), Snapchat users will just have to wait and see what new updates bring. In response to the Change.org petition, Snapchat acknowledges that “the new Snapchat has felt uncomfortable for many,” and announced that they will soon roll out tabs in the ‘Friends’ and ‘Discover’ sections of the app in the hopes that this will make it easier for users to find stories.

Snapchat’s stock value (20 February – 20 March)

 

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The world according to media